Jagan bhoo bakasura padakam gurinchi question chesina valla meda case lu pedatam - Botsa

[Pavanonline]

6 hours ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Rastra prabhuthvam niyaminchina adhikari

Are there any required qualifications for this "officer"? In this environment it will be a disaster for govt to appoint one.

[johnydanylee]

Just now, Pavanonline said:

Are there any required qualifications for this "officer"?

Judges ni peekesi velle judgements ichesthe sari.. 

[psycopk]

9 minutes ago, Pavanonline said:

Are there any required qualifications for this "officer"? In this environment it will be a disaster for govt to appoint one.

Yes he should be from ycp cader…

who obeys ycp leader words with out question..

 

[CanadianMalodu]

32 minutes ago, Pavanonline said:

Are there any required qualifications for this "officer"? In this environment it will be a disaster for govt to appoint one.

First of all, you need to understand that the act is stayed by Andhra High court and lower judiciary can still continue hearing existing litigations and take up fresh ones, till HC division bench gives fresh orders. So, it's not effective /implemented yet. 

The land authority itself will be headed by IAS who will be at the level of chief secretary or special chief secretary.

Title registration and appellate authority can be retired or serving officer at a level of Joint Collector. 

[Anta Assamey]

On 5/2/2024 at 10:14 AM, kittaya said:

Central govt gave the draft bills... And states responsibility to make changes or not and to implement it or not .. 

Central Government Draft modalu pettinde Nov-2019 lo...Bill in AP assembly was introduced in July 2019....Check the NITI AYOG doc..Just read First Page ... First paragraph inka em avasaramledu...

 

2019 Nov NITI ayog draft...

https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2022-12/ModelConclusiveLandTitlingAct.pdf

 

2019 July AP assembly

https://legislation.aplegislature.org/PreviewPage.do?filePath=basePath&fileName=Bills/PassedBills/English/Eng_passbill_L_15_15_24_150_v_1.pdf

[Pavanonline]

On 5/2/2024 at 2:02 PM, CanadianMalodu said:

First of all, you need to understand that the act is stayed by Andhra High court and lower judiciary can still continue hearing existing litigations and take up fresh ones, till HC division bench gives fresh orders. So, it's not effective /implemented yet. 

The land authority itself will be headed by IAS who will be at the level of chief secretary or special chief secretary.

Title registration and appellate authority can be retired or serving officer at a level of Joint Collector. 

Title register will be appointed by govt without any qualifications, that's the main issue and 100% guaranteed will be misused. Same loophole Jagan used to appoint nearly 100 advisers. And once appellate authority (again under govt control) decides, only highcourt can "review", this is another huge loophole.  How many will have access or time to be at highcourt and how many cases can high court alone look into?

[CanadianMalodu]

12 minutes ago, Pavanonline said:

Title register will be appointed by govt without any qualifications, that's the main issue and 100% guaranteed will be misused. Same loophole Jagan used to appoint nearly 100 advisers. And once appellate authority (again under govt control) decides, only highcourt can "review", this is another huge loophole.  How many will have access or time to be at highcourt and how many cases can high court alone look into?

Have you read the act even? For the authority itself it will be headed by senior IAS with a a rank of chief secretary/Special chief secretary. It's clearly stated in Chapters V&VI of the act.

What why do think HC reviewing is a loop hole? High court is vested with an oversight of lower judiciary. Since, the act empowers bureaucracy with judicial powers defend parallel to lower judiciary, they will under the oversight of higher judiciary and state high court is apex court for the state. 

[psycopk]

6 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Have you read the act even? For the authority itself it will be headed by senior IAS with a a rank of chief secretary/Special chief secretary. It's clearly stated in Chapters V&VI of the act.

What why do think HC reviewing is a loop hole? High court is vested with an oversight of lower judiciary. Since, the act empowers bureaucracy with judicial powers defend parallel to lower judiciary, they will under the oversight of higher judiciary and state high court is apex court for the state. 

They will under the oversight and insight of higher undersigt of inside of cheddi of jagan mohan reddy…

nice argument ponnavolu

[Pavanonline]

7 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Have you read the act even? For the authority itself it will be headed by senior IAS with a a rank of chief secretary/Special chief secretary. It's clearly stated in Chapters V&VI of the act.

What why do think HC reviewing is a loop hole? High court is vested with an oversight of lower judiciary. Since, the act empowers bureaucracy with judicial powers defend parallel to lower judiciary, they will under the oversight of higher judiciary and state high court is apex court for the state. 

No you are wrong, doesn't matter who heads it, tro there's no requirement. For appellate there are. it's the one who decides on ground level matters and no amount of gaslighting will help. Loop hole is "only" , it's out of civil court jurisdiction. "Bureaucracy with judicial powers aa 😂” idi too much even for you, bureaucracy with judicial powers is called judicial branch which being independent is the check on executive. If executive will act like judiciary we can close courts.

[CanadianMalodu]

1 hour ago, Pavanonline said:

No you are wrong, doesn't matter who heads it, tro there's no requirement. For appellate there are. it's the one who decides on ground level matters and no amount of gaslighting will help. Loop hole is "only" , it's out of civil court jurisdiction. "Bureaucracy with judicial powers aa 😂” idi too much even for you, bureaucracy with judicial powers is called judicial branch which being independent is the check on executive. If executive will act like judiciary we can close courts.

The act perse didn't list title register eligibility and the hierarchy wrt. Appellate.  Appellate will have a final say as it appears from the verbatim. Appellate is at least at the level of JC (serving or retired). Although not explicitly stated,High court and even IAS machinery would never agree to empower a nobody with Judicial powers. It's simply not going to be that way. They would probably have somebody at DRO/RDO level. 

Judiciary is a different body on its own. Judicial powers are conferred to beaurcrats as well. Which is why you refer to some of them as 'Magistrates' such as Tehsildar (MRO), Collector (District Magistrate) so on. In this particular case they are empowered with judicial powers on par with lower judiciary. If the same matters were to be tried in lower civil courts, this entire exercise becomes a moot point.

You don't need to close lower courts. Land title disputes are not the only civil cases that lower judiciary handles. If any, this exercise lowers the burden on the lower judiciary and number of layers involved.