Jump to content

Another NRI case


rahulroy4u

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Quickgun_murugan

    8

  • Don_Draper

    8

  • MRI

    5

  • Diana

    4

15 minutes ago, Quickgun_murugan said:

 Moreover mana Indian system lo ammayini abbayini samanamga parents a chudaru inka bayata vallu enduk chestaru... Parents asthulu andaru kids ki samanamga iyyali.... Katnam concept undoddu... 

A Hindu woman or girl will have equal property rights along with other male relatives for any partition made in intestate succession after September 2005, the Supreme Court has ruled.

A bench of justices R. M. Lodha and Jagdish Singh Khehar in a judgment said that under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, the daughters are entitled to equal inheritance rights along with other male siblings, which was not available to them prior to the amendment.

The apex court said the female inheritors would not only have the succession rights but also the same liabilities fastened on the property along with the male members.

“The new Section 6 provides for parity of rights in the coparcenary property among male and female members of a joint Hindu family on and from September 9, 2005. The legislature has now conferred substantive right in favour of the daughters.

“According to the new Section 6, the daughter of a coparcener becomes a coparcener by birth in her own rights and liabilities in the same manner as the son. The declaration in Section 6 that the daughter of the coparcener shall have same rights and liabilities in the coparcenary property as she would have been a son is unambiguous and unequivocal,”Justice Lodha, writing the judgment, said.

The term coparcener refers to the equal inheritance right of a person in a property.

The apex court passed the ruling while upholding the appeal filed by Ganduri Koteshwaramma, daughter of late Chakiri Venkata Swamy, challenging the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s decision not to recognise equal property rights of women along with their male siblings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Keerthana said:

A Hindu woman or girl will have equal property rights along with other male relatives for any partition made in intestate succession after September 2005, the Supreme Court has ruled.

A bench of justices R. M. Lodha and Jagdish Singh Khehar in a judgment said that under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, the daughters are entitled to equal inheritance rights along with other male siblings, which was not available to them prior to the amendment.

The apex court said the female inheritors would not only have the succession rights but also the same liabilities fastened on the property along with the male members.

“The new Section 6 provides for parity of rights in the coparcenary property among male and female members of a joint Hindu family on and from September 9, 2005. The legislature has now conferred substantive right in favour of the daughters.

“According to the new Section 6, the daughter of a coparcener becomes a coparcener by birth in her own rights and liabilities in the same manner as the son. The declaration in Section 6 that the daughter of the coparcener shall have same rights and liabilities in the coparcenary property as she would have been a son is unambiguous and unequivocal,”Justice Lodha, writing the judgment, said.

The term coparcener refers to the equal inheritance right of a person in a property.

The apex court passed the ruling while upholding the appeal filed by Ganduri Koteshwaramma, daughter of late Chakiri Venkata Swamy, challenging the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s decision not to recognise equal property rights of women along with their male siblings.

Law gurichi kadu akkayya manushula gurinchi... 90% don't care about this.. Sad but true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Don_Draper said:

Haha you have just seen drop in an NRI ocean.. US lo aithey pelli ki katnam teskoni US raaganey one month lo job lo join chepistaru..first flashy cars illu konukovali kada.. I don't mean everyone are same but most of them share same passions.. 

hmm..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Don_Draper said:

Contrary girls kuda dowry baaga adigey vadini pelli cheskokudadu..naako bike kavali car kavali cut drawyer kavali ani mundu teslinappudu y to marry such idiots..

idi jaragani pani.. love marriages valle parents adugutunnaru ani dowry adige days kada ivi ..inka arranged marriages cheppane akkarledu..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Don_Draper said:

i was talking about forcing .. force cheyyam ankuntam but adi forcing ee avtundi.. vallu anukuneytappudu chestaru job cheyyalanipistey.. amey job chestadi appudey illu nadustundi ani situation untey first place lo felli ee cheskoakkarledu.. US lo aithey chala chusanu chustuney vunnanu.. PPl go to parties akkad memu illu konnam meeru eppudu kontunnaru etc etc vi chala vaagutaru.. appudu start aithadi jatara..

Those r cheap mentality comparative analysis dickheads man.. Not all r same... I have seen cases girls force husbands to get them. Job n if they so no need.. Samana hakkulu thokkutunnaru thotakura antaru... Tappu andarilo undi... But US ammayi job chesthey she gets more confidence n independence.. Bhayalu veedi commercial thoughts tho kakunda learning life angle lo job cheyyali... Shouldn't stress out but learn continousually on how to handle life

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not a feminist..Initial posts chusi koncham disappoint ayya but there are men to speak up for women...HE for SHE..feeling content..thanks guys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On May 30, 2016 at 0:23 PM, cyndrilla said:

I am not a feminist..Initial posts chusi koncham disappoint ayya but there are men to speak up for women...HE for SHE..feeling content..thanks guys

gp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/30/2016 at 9:20 AM, Quickgun_murugan said:

Those r cheap mentality comparative analysis dickheads man.. Not all r same... I have seen cases girls force husbands to get them. Job n if they so no need.. Samana hakkulu thokkutunnaru thotakura antaru... Tappu andarilo undi... But US ammayi job chesthey she gets more confidence n independence.. Bhayalu veedi commercial thoughts tho kakunda learning life angle lo job cheyyali... Shouldn't stress out but learn continousually on how to handle life

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/30/2016 at 3:33 AM, Spell_Hunter said:

why should they stay away - meeremanna samaaja seva chestunnaraa - oka manchi guy with no aasthi no job but true potential meeru cheskuntaraa - idi kuda anthe untadi - nuvvu nenu enni talk cheskunna - men are forced to be successful so that they could get a decent life partner - meeru guys ni ala force chesinapudu guys side kuda alane untadi mari - feminist batch aithe seppataanki em ledu inka 

+1 -1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/30/2016 at 9:02 PM, cyndrilla said:

Telugu vallaku unnantha dhana daaham vere evvarki undadhu...marriage is a business for most of the guy families...alanti gay fellows please stay away from marriages..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...