Bollywood liberal logic

[NiranjanGaaru]

Aamir khan -my wife feeling India is intolerant ,she is asking me we should go somewhere,2015 or 16 , Bollywood blown up this issue and made this intolerance issue

But no action on him by bjp central govt

Kangana ranaut - Mumbai is like pok under shivsena govt

BMC destroyed her building

[NiranjanGaaru]

No sickular bollies supported her

Anti Hindu nexus in Bollywood

[yoda123]

building destroying konchem over the top ...

but she needed some jhalak therapy though ...

[NiranjanGaaru]

6 minutes ago, yoda123 said:

building destroying konchem over the top ...

but she needed some jhalak therapy though ...

Why she didn't have freedom of expression

Did ED,CBI raided anti Hindu khans for their comments?

[yoda123]

3 minutes ago, NiranjanGaaru said:

Why she didn't have freedom of expression

Did ED,CBI raided anti Hindu khans for their comments?

India lo 'freedom of expression' nijama ??

muscular chest thumping nationalistic party hayaamu lo ..??

[yoda123]

aamir sharukh and salman khan are definitely patriots .... with good hearts ...

if your definition of patriotism mean to hate islam and hating 'good pakistanis' ... their patriotism wont fit ur bill though ...

[NiranjanGaaru]

4 minutes ago, yoda123 said:

aamir sharukh and salman khan are definitely patriots .... with good hearts ...

if your definition of patriotism mean to hate islam and hating pakistan ... their patriotism wont fit ur bill though ...

And yet this is what SRK said in 2010 after the billion-dollar Indian Premier League (IPL) decided not to accept Pakistani cricket players: ‘‘Pakistan is a great neighbour to have. We are great neighbours, they are good neighbours. Let us love each other. Let me be honest. My family is from Pakistan, my father was born there and his family is from there.’’

Really? In what universe is Pakistan a great neighbour? One doesn’t have to reel off statistics to prove Pakistan is by no means a good neighbour to have. Virtually every terrorist attack on the planet can be traced back to Pakistan – the latest being San Bernardino. It is a measure of Pakistan’s reputation that ‘Paki’ tops the totem pole of four-letter words in Britain.

Banning Pakistanis

So why had the IPL banned Pakistani players? Well, just two years earlier, 10 Pakistani terrorists had raided the city of Mumbai, killing 154 and injuring hundreds of Indians and foreign tourists. The terrorists struck a railway station during rush hour, luxury hotels, a synagogue and a maternity hospital. Yes, read that again – a maternity hospital.

These are the targets chosen by SRK’s beloved country.

The attackers were trained by the Pakistani military and intelligence agencies, which continue to spawn an endless supply of terrorists that are sent not only to India but to every troublespot in the world. Sometimes they are sent to places you wouldn’t think of as troublespots – such as New Zealand. (http://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/local-news/local-blogs/dark-matter/8819157/What-are-Pakistani-terrorists-doing-in-New-Zealand)

And yet, Khan thinks Pakistan is a good neighbour to have. With his sweeping statements, Khan insulted the memory of the innocent civilians who were brutally killed and the commandos and policemen who died in their attempt to free Mumbai from the jihadis in November 2008.

While the Indian government and most of the leftist media networks tried to suppress the stories of tortures of the hostages, at least one website didn’t sanitise the truth. Doctors, who had conducted post-mortems on the victims, told 

A History of Supporting Pakistanis

In February 2007, after losing the T-20 World Cup final match to India, Shoaib Malik the captain of the Pakistani cricket team apologised to ‘‘Muslims all over the world’’ for not being able to beat India. That statement made many Indian Muslims cringe. After all, there were two Muslim players in the Indian side that beat the Pakistanis. In fact, it is a measure of how much they identified with India that those two Muslim players, Irfan Khan and Zaheer Khan, were always more aggro when they played against Pakistan.

But what did SRK do? He tried to defend Malik in a subsequent interview. “I don’t think he meant to segregate Muslims and Christians and Hindus and say this was a match between Islam and Hinduism,” he said.

Who the hell told you that SRK? Did the Pakistani cricketer phone you up and personally tell you what he ‘really’ meant?

It seems SRK is some sort of middleman who is trying to validate Pakistani players for Indian team owners. Disappointed at the Indian cricket board’s decision to ban the Pakistani players, he said it was humiliating to him as a team owner that no one bid for the Pakistani players despite them being put up for auction. “They are the champions, they are wonderful but somewhere down the line there is an issue and we can’t deny it,” he told a news channel.

But SRK is the one living in denial. In fact, he had as many as five players from Pakistan playing for his team Kolkata Knight Riders in the IPL’s first edition in 2007. What does that tell you about his feelings towards Pakistan?

SRK’s record in hurting Indian sensibilities remains consistent. In 2009 when the IPL cricket tournament was temporarily moved to South Africa, he replaced the highly popular Sourav Ganguly as skipper and foisted New Zealander Brendon McCullum on his team. Much like his performance in New Zealand, McCullum was a complete disaster.

John Buchanan, his Australian coach, publicly insulted Indian players. ‘‘Sourav, Dravid and Laxman have reached the twilight in T20 cricket,’’ he said in a press conference. Anyone who had seen Ganguly and Dravid bat in 2010 would have thought Buchanan was stark, raving mad. SRK did not reprimand Buchanan for snubbing the three all-time greats. The actor had no reason to be outraged because Buchanan had insulted Indians not

[NiranjanGaaru]

Yeah great patriot khans

Salman khan is an exception in patriotism better than other khans

[yoda123]

judge a person by actions ... not by words ...

looks like ur definition of patriotism includes funny sport cricket as well

[tom brady]

26 minutes ago, NiranjanGaaru said:

Why she didn't have freedom of expression

Did ED,CBI raided anti Hindu khans for their comments?

Lol freedom of expression? Is it still there in supreme leaders regime? Even SC agrees to that as per prashant bhushan case

[tom bhayya]

Bakths on duty economy rating news divert cheyadaaniki Sache dhin

[ZoomNaidu]

2 hours ago, yoda123 said:

aamir sharukh and salman khan are definitely patriots .... with good hearts ...

if your definition of patriotism mean to hate islam and hating 'good pakistanis' ... their patriotism wont fit ur bill though ...

Vaallu kuda addham lo chusukoni navvukuntaaremo 

[ZoomNaidu]

1 hour ago, tom brady said:

Lol freedom of expression? Is it still there in supreme leaders regime? Even SC agrees to that as per prashant bhushan case

It’s gone in IndiraGandhi’s era itself - ippudu battal chinchukotam waste 

[dasara_bullodu1]

patrioits anta ... 😀

em defense ra ayya shiva sena congress tho join ayye sariki full confidence meeda unnaru adarsh liberals

 

[Vaampire]

5 hours ago, yoda123 said:

aamir sharukh and salman khan are definitely patriots .... with good hearts ...

if your definition of patriotism mean to hate islam and hating 'good pakistanis' ... their patriotism wont fit ur bill though ...

Tiger menon ni hang cheyyadam thappu, he is innocent ani theerpu ichina salman khan patriot aa. Lol