Jump to content

Asal Gandhi hero ela autadu


dasara_bullodu1

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, dasara_bullodu1 said:

India before 1947 Aghanistan daka undedi ...

Actual country ni mukkalu chesi vadileste Gandhi gadu cinema chusadu... vadu hero endi thu

the way I see it ... if gandhi wasnt there then most likely we would have got freedom after a decade with lot of violence. And most likely indians would have died in huge numbers.

That is good enough.

It still surprises me north and south india are still under one nation.

We want united nation of south India.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, yemdoing said:

the way I see it ... if gandhi wasnt there then most likely we would have got freedom after a decade with lot of violence. And most likely indians would have died in huge numbers.

That is good enough.

It still surprises me north and south india are still under one nation.

We want united nation of south India.

 

He happily fell into trap laid by British by accepting the divide-and-rule policy ...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, dasara_bullodu1 said:

India before 1947 Aghanistan daka undedi ...

Actual country ni mukkalu chesi vadileste Gandhi gadu cinema chusadu... vadu hero endi thu

There was never a country called India before Independence. British ruled major part of the sub continent from Afghanistan to Burma (Myanmar). 

Never in history, a single kingdom ruled the area from Afghanistan to present India to call it one country.  As a mater of fact, India as you see now was not ruled by one kingdom at a time (Not even British). 

Taking a violence path like Bose is easy, but taking non violence path and keeping the whole nation together (especially when its so diverse with different, languages, castes, religion, ethnicities etc) to fight against British is not an easy task.  He might has drawbacks like many general people do, but, he is hero for bringing independence via non violence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, proudtobeandhrite said:

There was never a country called India before Independence. British ruled major part of the sub continent from Afghanistan to Burma (Myanmar). 

Never in history, a single kingdom ruled the area from Afghanistan to present India to call it one country.  As a mater of fact, India as you see now was not ruled by one kingdom at a time (Not even British). 

Taking a violence path like Bose is easy, but taking non violence path and keeping the whole nation together (especially when its so diverse with different, languages, castes, religion, ethnicities etc) to fight against British is not an easy task.  He might has drawbacks like many general people do, but, he is hero for bringing independence via non violence.

 

As per your words...British "Indian" empire has been broken into multiple countries.

And Bold : Gandhi didn't unite whole "nation", because the whole nation includes Pakistan Bangladesh too...he took the easy path

 

It's like saying KKR is hero of Telangana formation because he fought for samiakyandhra

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MRI said:

Let's not have a conflict with him. I highly recommend you to setup a 1-on-1 with him and discuss this disagreement in a collaborative manner. Please report back on the outcome. Thank you and good luck.

241s8Af4qLcER__bYN9kg9kNvkbjUwfyutK5_DLd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, dasara_bullodu1 said:

India before 1947 Aghanistan daka undedi ...

Actual country ni mukkalu chesi vadileste Gandhi gadu cinema chusadu... vadu hero endi thu

Before british there is no single country

After british different kings, royal families fought for their kingdoms.

At the beginning of 1900s only elite like zamindars , trades men , lawyers and educated formed congress party for better govt participation not Independence or a country 

 

After Ramayana, mahabharata, it's only one man united everyone from north to south east to west. It's ghandi and his ghandi-ism.

 

His purpose is to just give a togetherness  And a way to  protest without voilence.

Unite ayyaka em pekkovalo theliyilapothe em cheyyalem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dasara_bullodu1 said:

 

As per your words...British "Indian" empire has been broken into multiple countries.

And Bold : Gandhi didn't unite whole "nation", because the whole nation includes Pakistan Bangladesh too...he took the easy path

 

It's like saying CBN is hero of Telangana movement

 

If your point is to hate Gandhi for not keeping the whole British India as one country then just go ahead.  But, understand that people like Jinnah wanted a separate Muslim country. No relationship lasts with one person being unhappy.

But anyway, why is it only Gandhi's fault, May be you or any other leader know who thinks of Akhand Bharat to include Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan should go for it.  Afterall, Russia invaded Crimea, US invaded Iraq.... Why dwelling in the past?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, proudtobeandhrite said:

If your point is to hate Gandhi for not keeping the whole British India as one country then just go ahead.  But, understand that people like Jinnah wanted a separate Muslim country. No relationship lasts with one person being unhappy.

But anyway, why is it only Gandhi's fault, May be you or any other leader know who thinks of Akhand Bharat to include Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan should go for it.  Afterall, Russia invaded Crimea, US invaded Iraq.... Why dwelling in the past?

Gandhi gadu fault enti ane, istam leni muslim can stay in india , istam unnallu pakistan ki vellipoindi annadu..

so godse did right thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MDharmarajuMA said:

Gandhi gadu fault enti ane, istam leni muslim can stay in india , istam unnallu pakistan ki vellipoindi annadu..

so godse did right thing.

Em chesi undali antav?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, proudtobeandhrite said:

If your point is to hate Gandhi for not keeping the whole British India as one country then just go ahead.  But, understand that people like Jinnah wanted a separate Muslim country. No relationship lasts with one person being unhappy.

But anyway, why is it only Gandhi's fault, May be you or any other leader know who thinks of Akhand Bharat to include Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan should go for it.  Afterall, Russia invaded Crimea, US invaded Iraq.... Why dwelling in the past?

Yes point is not but partition but focused on Gandhi

Gandhi is just another local leader... the worship of Gandhi is crap.. it's a trap laid by the west so that leaders can't cross the line laid by them. For the British, it's mission complete

to occupy other countries, get rid of Gandhi first

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MDharmarajuMA said:

Gandhi gadu fault enti ane, istam leni muslim can stay in india , istam unnallu pakistan ki vellipoindi annadu..

so godse did right thing.

 

For example, If i and my family are Muslim living in southern India for generations and centuries, Do i have to leave my birth place and give it up because i am a muslim? Is it fair to do so?  

Not even pakistan did that, It let minorities stay there even it being a muslim country. I dont agree with their persecution of minorities and i don't want India to go in their path.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...