1 minute ago, viky said:

agree uncle, itserve reference thone tidtuna, 

@Spartan 

csr anna GC otchina tarvtha meliga maripoyindu choosinava, nothing to do with him anta. ITserve toni, chetulu kalpindu

ps: csr anna just kidding.

Bro he is bad guy ane antuna but context is withreference to this year h1b fraud 

4 minutes ago, cameraman said:

he answered this question as well

According to him USCIS may not  give another chance to people who missed it this year (even if they are left over visas  in the 85k limit). They are more worried about dealing with fraud guys first and correcting system. 

That's too late bro karma 

2 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

If multiple companies file h1 for the same candidate they cnt do anything and its legal to do so. 
 

The issue is for companies trying to fake that they are not related but having the operating address as the same. Or same owners. Or had same address previously but changed to diff address not to get caught. Thats what the fraud is. No where did uscis mention about fraud by candidates. This rahul baba is just faking it

candidates are considered as victims here, they might just revoke, but mestiries did the fraud ani ostadhi.

1 minute ago, JavaBava said:

If multiple companies file h1 for the same candidate they cnt do anything and its legal to do so. 
 

The issue is for companies trying to fake that they are not related but having the operating address as the same. Or same owners. Or had same address previously but changed to diff address not to get caught. Thats what the fraud is. No where did uscis mention about fraud by candidates. This rahul baba is just faking it

consultancies are applying multiple applications with no actual legit job offer, they are using their sister companies for same candidates. 

Candidates are considered as fraud as they are supporting and cooperating with such employers on this.

 

If legit companies like Apple. Google or some reputed companies apply for same dude then that is a diff valid case.

The fraud is on the companies. There is no way for the candidate to know if the job is fake or not if you think about it frankly. Someone offered you a job and they are filing for h1. Candidate is not responsible to verify the job location. Fraud is by companies. Rahul baba is talking BS to create panic

9 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

They have to get rid of that rule first. 2 companies cannot apply for the same candidate. But companies have no way to know that. They can argue on that basis. 

this will also be a problem kada if a smart masters guy got full time job into salesforce and microsft anukukundam , he can apply for both kada its chicken egge problem 

9 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

The fraud is on the companies. There is no way for the candidate to know if the job is fake or not if you think about it frankly. Someone offered you a job and they are filing for h1. Candidate is not responsible to verify the job location. Fraud is by companies. Rahul baba is talking BS to create panic

exactly mestris mistake avutadhi

ee rahul creating panic

25 minutes ago, csrcsr said:

It's nothing to do with him anni news articles lo vachindi ,he might have represented itserve earlier the whole point of discussion now is on the recent year lottery

https://www.washingtonpost.comolitics/2023/04/28/immigration-tech-visa-h1b-fraud/9a2c607a-e5d4-11ed-9696-8e874fd710b8_story.html

Some applicants may convince different, independently-owned companies to sponsor them in the lottery, which is perfectly legal. 
 

what does this means?

1 hour ago, cameraman said:

One of my friend got from india got H1 approval last year trough a consultancy , they used  WITCH company letter as a client letter. Some how stamping done successfully . He is scared to come to the US now with all this news.   

Sodhi Idhi Antha .. unless client ki call or email chesthe kani teledu .. with uscis being under staffed, valla ki Antha bomma ledu 3yrs venakki poyi ah petitions ni malli check cheyataniki 

2 minutes ago, Guest said:

Some applicants may convince different, independently-owned companies to sponsor them in the lottery, which is perfectly legal. 
 

what does this means?

different independently owned companies meaning the companies have no relation like fb , microsft anuko 

what some guys are doing is two companies valave untayi one behaves as client to other or two companies tho register chestaru h1b 

6 minutes ago, Guest said:

Some applicants may convince different, independently-owned companies to sponsor them in the lottery, which is perfectly legal. 
 

what does this means?

Consultancy-a and consultancy-b idharu candidate-xyz ki h1b file chestaru .. which is legal .. kani issue is, if a & b file h1b for xyz candidate with same client-1234 .. which will be a violation .. adi counts as duplication 

19 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

The fraud is on the companies. There is no way for the candidate to know if the job is fake or not if you think about it frankly. Someone offered you a job and they are filing for h1. Candidate is not responsible to verify the job location. Fraud is by companies. Rahul baba is talking BS to create panic

Same client letter petti more than 1-company same candidate ki file cheyakidadu .. adi illegal .. okallu in-house petti inkollu client-xyz pedithe no issues, or both different clients Pettina no issue

27 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

They have to get rid of that rule first. 2 companies cannot apply for the same candidate. But companies have no way to know that. They can argue on that basis. 

H1b anedi future employment ki .. google Microsoft Amazon all 3 can file h1b for candidate-a .. that is not at all wrong .. 

1 hour ago, cameraman said:

 

He is scaring everyone. 

27 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

The fraud is on the companies. There is no way for the candidate to know if the job is fake or not if you think about it frankly. Someone offered you a job and they are filing for h1. Candidate is not responsible to verify the job location. Fraud is by companies. Rahul baba is talking BS to create panic

That’s not true … applicant needs to inquiry about the company  before accepting the job and submitting the docs for h1b ..

 

my cousin ( india lo vuntadu)went to h1b stamping VO said visa approved ani .. after 2 weeks got email  to attend  for interview and VO said we are seeing issue with petitioner ani cheppi 221g iCharu later revoked by saying “ fraud petitioner and fraud beneficiary “ani check box tick chesi documents icharu 

 

consultancy is sister company of other company and mestri  saying will do transfer don’t worry Adhi edhi ani sollu saying ..eppudu petitioner fraud and beneficiary kuda fraud avuthadhi and it’s red flag for future visas… Murthy law firm said 5years varaku black list lo vuntavu and don’t apply nor next few years.. so be careful while going with mesthri.. eppudu miss ayyina future lo caught avutharu go with legit company