Jump to content

A.P High Court dismisses Chandrababu Naidu's plea to quash FIR


andhra_jp

Recommended Posts

 

Andhra Pradesh High Court dismisses former CM N. Chandrababu Naidu's plea to quash FIR registered over skill development scam case.

HC says the petition is "devoid of merit" & that it can't interfere when the investigation is reaching its finality.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, andhra_jp said:

 

Andhra Pradesh High Court dismisses former CM N. Chandrababu Naidu's plea to quash FIR registered over skill development scam case.

HC says the petition is "devoid of merit" & that it can't interfere when the investigation is reaching its finality.

As expected. Delhi nunchi signal ledhu. Baboru ki Malli jail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'When public servant is alleged to have committed offence of fabrication of records or misappropriation of funds, it cannot be said that he acted in discharge of official duties' : AP High Court on why Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act is not applicable to #ChandrababuNaidu

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ticket said:

As expected  when bench is highly respected. 

Mari endhuku file cheyadam ? verdict before idhey point , judgement favour vastey ok otherwise thokkas is the reason.  . 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, pizzaaddict said:

Mari endhuku file cheyadam ? verdict before idhey point , judgement favour vastey ok otherwise thokkas is the reason.  . 

 

Cbn should have opted to other bench when chance given.

Blind trust of this tokas big mistake by cbn. 

Highly respected garu.. judgment lo ayaku ayane contradict chestunnadu...3 years..still case beginning stage annadu.. malli case finality lo unnappudu interfere avvam annadu..logic ento tokalake teliyali

https://x.com/iamkandula/status/1705161048993714181?s=20

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Android_Halwa said:

Next CID custody ae…

Motham bayataki vastayi…atarvata ayya koduku ni kusapetti confront chepisthe scene to scene…inkokadu vunadu kada ganta gadu…a Rajesh kilaru gadu..next meere ra rei ..!

Skill ni scam chesinaru…lol..ide na vision ante !

2 days custody ichindi already ACB court...torch.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ticket said:

 

Cbn should have opted to other bench when chance given.

Blind trust of this tokas big mistake by cbn. 

Highly respected garu.. judgment lo ayaku ayane contradict chestunnadu...3 years..still case beginning stage annadu.. malli case finality lo unnappudu interfere avvam annadu..logic ento tokalake teliyali

https://x.com/iamkandula/status/1705161048993714181?s=20

 

Section 17A of the PC Act cannot be made applicable in those cases where the act of the public servant that amounts to an offence appears on the face of it lacking in good faith. Issuing public building license and no objection certificates cannot be said to be acts done in good faith...Use or utilization of public funds by a public servant under the colour of authority but really for his own benefit cannot be considered as an act done in discharge of his official functions or duties. Such an act is not entitled to get the protection under Section 17A of the Act," the Court stated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, pizzaaddict said:

Section 17A of the PC Act cannot be made applicable in those cases where the act of the public servant that amounts to an offence appears on the face of it lacking in good faith. Issuing public building license and no objection certificates cannot be said to be acts done in good faith...Use or utilization of public funds by a public servant under the colour of authority but really for his own benefit cannot be considered as an act done in discharge of his official functions or duties. Such an act is not entitled to get the protection under Section 17A of the Act," the Court stated.

Haha ohoo..emanna chappara Toka garu..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, ticket said:

 

Cbn should have opted to other bench when chance given.

Blind trust of this tokas big mistake by cbn. 

Highly respected garu.. judgment lo ayaku ayane contradict chestunnadu...3 years..still case beginning stage annadu.. malli case finality lo unnappudu interfere avvam annadu..logic ento tokalake teliyali

https://x.com/iamkandula/status/1705161048993714181?s=20

 

xii) The first information report is not an encyclopaedia which must disclose all facts and details relating to the offence reported. Therefore, when the investigation by the police is in progress, the court should not go into the merits of the allegations in the FIR. Police must be permitted to complete the investigation. It would be premature to pronounce the conclusion based on hazy facts that the complaint/FIR does not deserve to be investigated or that it amounts to abuse of process of law. After investigation, if the investigating officer finds that there is no substance in the application made by the complainant, the investigating officer may file an 64

appropriate report/summary before the learned Magistrate which may be considered by the learned Magistrate in accordance with the known procedure; xiii) The power under Section 482 Cr. P.C. is very wide,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, ticket said:

 

Cbn should have opted to other bench when chance given.

Blind trust of this tokas big mistake by cbn. 

Highly respected garu.. judgment lo ayaku ayane contradict chestunnadu...3 years..still case beginning stage annadu.. malli case finality lo unnappudu interfere avvam annadu..logic ento tokalake teliyali

https://x.com/iamkandula/status/1705161048993714181?s=20

 

Gajjiiiii pulka

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Android_Halwa said:

Next CID custody ae…

Motham bayataki vastayi…atarvata ayya koduku ni kusapetti confront chepisthe scene to scene…inkokadu vunadu kada ganta gadu…a Rajesh kilaru gadu..next meere ra rei ..!

Skill ni scam chesinaru…lol..ide na vision ante !

bro, for my knowledge sake adugutunna.. are you a hardcore jagn fan or anti-cbn?

quashing a petition is a big thing, no matter who sits on the bench, will not do it unless if the whole thing is completely based on false accusations w/o any proof

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...