Jump to content

Pv Narasimha Rao.

VizagRocks

By VizagRocks
in Old Discussions

 Share

Recommended Posts

athletics Hero

athletics

Posted
Posted

 what's with his english? the book is a flop anyways and how does that matter?

 

who said he is an economist?

 

PVNR's forte was leadership and cleverness - he could bluff, manage and, if need be, buy anybody to pursue what he tought is better for the country.

 

He shielded Manmohan Singh from all the political pressures from with in his party and the oppsition and also he gave him a free hand to pursue the reforms.

 

Secondly, India then was in the worst position possible position both monitarily and internal politcs *babri masjid demolistion.

 

His greatness is he didn't succumb to pressures and played one up when everyone though he is done once and for all.

 

Speaking of his honesty, he is not corrupt and didn't make any money, even for his kids fees he has to depend on his brother-inlaw (there are many stories on the net if you look), even after his term as prime minister he was looking for buyers to sell his house in hyderabad to pay off his bills.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • VizagRocks

    43

  • Comfort

    24

  • sattipandu

    16

  • donganaaK

    12

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Bosuuu Jr Artist

Bosuuu

Posted
Posted

Indira gandhi
Vajpayee
Manmohan singh 1st term

Those are my best 3

 

 

Yeah nee opinion neeku undachu...I respect that. For me

 

Indira Gandhi 

PVNR
Manmohan

Rajiv gandhi ( Health sector chala better ayyindi tana govt lone)

Vajpayee ( apart from National highways and Kargil war success cheppukodaniki peddaga emi ledu, But personal ga vajpayee ante istam)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
missionxp Celebrity

missionxp

Posted
Posted

rendu threads esi potha annav....i think you should stick to your words.

CITI_c$y  CITI_c$y  CITI_c$y  CITI_c$y  CITI_c$y  CITI_c$y

Link to comment
Share on other sites
athletics Hero

athletics

Posted
Posted

indira gandhi sagamu onga bettendi, no doubt she was a powerful lady but the emergency was a bad precedence.

 

1970-1990 varaku India missed the reform period that is where China leap frogged

Link to comment
Share on other sites
athletics Hero

athletics

Posted
Posted

Anta baane matladavu correct ee kani inka neeku correct information ledu anukunta...

 

Yes PVNR is forced to do economic reforms ...economic reforms cheyadam anedi PVNR idea kadu... IMF manaki  economic reforms liberalise cheyali ani condition pettindi... so ippudu ee situation lo PVNR really great.. Manmohan singh UGC ki director ga unde... he knew the capabilities of manmohan already so ataniki pilichi Rajya sabha MP seat ichi finance minister chesadu... then  PVNR industrial minister evvariki ivvakunda tane industry ministry unchukunnadu  economic reforms ki kavlsina signatures easy ga ]avvadaniki. 

 

So PVNR is a decision maker, took correct decisions in crucial time, apart from that minority govt kabatti PVNR ki enta sepu govt ni kapadukovadam ee saripoyindi... otherwise PVNR inka chala goppa panulu ento chesevadu..

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VizagRocks Celebrity

VizagRocks

Posted
  • Author
Posted

what's with his english? the book is a flop anyways and how does that matter?


the book was poorly written, because the ideas in it were all half baked. I think that is the problem with being a polyglot. Pretty sure he writes well in Telugu/Marathi. But he came across as a boastful character from the book.


PVNR's forte was leadership and cleverness[/size] - [/size]he could bluff, manage and, if need be, buy anybody to pursue what he tought is better for the country.[/size]
 
He shielded Manmohan Singh from all the political pressures from with in his party and the oppsition and also he gave him a free hand to pursue the reforms.[/size]
 
Secondly, India then was in the worst position possible position both monitarily and internal politcs *babri masjid demolistion.[/size]
 
His greatness is he didn't succumb to pressures and played one up when everyone though he is done once and for all.[/size]


It is wrong to attribute any sort of liberalisation to him. Because after 25yrs, we are still stuck with an underperforming economy. IMO, MMS has the right idea of how to liberalise (based on his interviews), but he doesn't have the political capital to enforce it. PVNR too didn't. so we should take it easy on calling him a reformist PM.

Speaking of his honesty, he is not corrupt and didn't make any money, even for his kids fees he has to depend on his brother-inlaw (there are many stories on the net if you look), even after his term as prime minister he was looking for buyers to sell his house in hyderabad to pay off his bills.[/size]


He may be personally honest. But he did do his part in institutionalizing corruption. atleast political corruption.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
VizagRocks Celebrity

VizagRocks

Posted
  • Author
Posted

evaru first then? according to you


MMS. because awesome fun to have a PM with such academic credentials.

But India doesn't deserve him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
siru LEGEND

siru

Posted
Posted

MMS. because awesome fun to have a PM with such academic credentials.

But India doesn't deserve him.

Same can be said of Obama..
US doesnt deserve him
Link to comment
Share on other sites
VizagRocks Celebrity

VizagRocks

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Same can be said of Obama..
US doesnt deserve him


There's no comparison. Obama is a showman. MMS isn't. Obama is good, because he's not Bush.

US is a fcuked up country. There'll never be a decent US President. Bernie Sanders, if he becomes PM, can be one, but he's still a loudmouth.

Toronto mayoral elections is a lot more fun than the tired arguments these presidential hopefuls spout.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
siru LEGEND

siru

Posted
Posted

There's no comparison. Obama is a showman. MMS isn't. Obama is good, because he's not Bush.

US is a fcuked up country. There'll never be a decent US President. Bernie Sanders, if he becomes PM, can be one, but he's still a loudmouth.

Toronto mayoral elections is a lot more fun than the tired arguments these presidential hopefuls spout.

Really? Heard ..Bernie sanders is leading hillary in Iowa
What makes hom a good candidate?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sattipandu LEGEND

sattipandu

Posted
Posted

There's no comparison. Obama is a showman. MMS isn't. Obama is good, because he's not Bush.

US is a fcuked up country. There'll never be a decent US President. Bernie Sanders, if he becomes PM, can be one, but he's still a loudmouth.

Toronto mayoral elections is a lot more fun than the tired arguments these presidential hopefuls spout.

what would you have to say about Donald Trump?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
siru LEGEND

siru

Posted
Posted

There's no comparison. Obama is a showman. MMS isn't. Obama is good, because he's not Bush.

US is a fcuked up country. There'll never be a decent US President. Bernie Sanders, if he becomes PM, can be one, but he's still a loudmouth.

Toronto mayoral elections is a lot more fun than the tired arguments these presidential hopefuls spout.

Was it Toronto mayor who was caught smoking weed?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
VizagRocks Celebrity

VizagRocks

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Really? Heard ..Bernie sanders is leading hillary in Iowa
What makes hom a good candidate?


For one, he loves Canada. That's all I know about him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...