Jump to content

BREAKING: Supreme Court rules that Trump admin can enforce immigration rule to limit green card access


tacobell fan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Spartan said:

proper form fill cheyali anduke..file chesetappudu.

No big deal, you can pay them by adjusting the filing with this year in case there are any mistakes. The point is doing any deliberate act of abusing the system. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Spartan said:

Good move for USA right..why would any govt want to free load the people who aint gonna stay here or pay taxes...

off course legal ga tax kattinodiki kuda vartistundi..but most of them wont use the Food Stamps. atleast..

PS: Some of the desi people who can mistakenly use the Public Funds.....

1) Free tax credit for children below 17, this is applicable only to US born child. if child is H4 , dont take that under ur tax deduction, it falls under public charge..

2) Maternity paid leave of 6 weeks apart from what company pays for. like ex. Amazon or FB lo 6 months maternity leave allow cheste..andulo the company will pay only for 12 weeks.... another 12 weeks or 6 weeks depending on the state is paid by State govt ..this comes under Public Charge...

3) Obama care Insurance...this also falls under public charge...

4) FHA mortgage also,. though most of us dont use that but still falls under that category

 

so be careful while taking above things...leda GC ki bokka pade chances chala unnai....

uncle 1 question company unpaid leave iste? state istunda? throw some light

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tacobell fan said:

No big deal, you can pay them by adjusting the filing with this year in case there are any mistakes. The point is doing any deliberate act of abusing the system. 

yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LazyRohit said:

uncle 1 question company unpaid leave iste? state istunda? throw some light

check with HR..

unpaid vacation teskunte..State pays 75% of the salary.and company pays 25% if company is liberal..

leda 75% salary ne vastadi...then it means u r taking States income..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Spartan said:

check with HR..

unpaid vacation teskunte..State pays 75% of the salary.and company pays 25% if company is liberal..

leda 75% salary ne vastadi...then it means u r taking States income..

so e news article prakaram adi teskovaddu antunava in case state nunchi vachina?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Spartan said:

Good move for USA right..why would any govt want to free load the people who aint gonna stay here or pay taxes...

off course legal ga tax kattinodiki kuda vartistundi..but most of them wont use the Food Stamps. atleast..

PS: Some of the desi people who can mistakenly use the Public Funds.....

1) Free tax credit for children below 17, this is applicable only to US born child. if child is H4 , dont take that under ur tax deduction, it falls under public charge..

2) Maternity paid leave of 6 weeks apart from what company pays for. like ex. Amazon or FB lo 6 months maternity leave allow cheste..andulo the company will pay only for 12 weeks.... another 12 weeks or 6 weeks depending on the state is paid by State govt ..this comes under Public Charge...

3) Obama care Insurance...this also falls under public charge...

4) FHA mortgage also,. though most of us dont use that but still falls under that category

 

so be careful while taking above things...leda GC ki bokka pade chances chala unnai....

Obama care insurance... n Health market place lo vunna insurances are both are the same ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, tacobell fan said:

Expanding definition of "public charge"

The term dates back to 1882, when the U.S. was trying to limit immigration from developing, non-white countries. The year it was first codified, the U.S. also enacted the discriminatory Chinese Exclusion Act, which barred the entry of most Chinese immigrants on the premise that they jeopardized "the good order of certain localities."

In the late 1990s, the Clinton administration issued guidance saying only cash benefits could be considered when determining whether an immigrant might be a "public charge." The Trump administration's policy substantially expands this term by broadening the type and amount of benefits that count against immigrants seeking to stay in or move to the U.S. 

Under the new regulation, caseworkers would consider enrollment in the widely used Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), certain federally funded Medicaid benefits, and a variety of forms of government-subsidized housing, including Section 8 vouchers.

Officials would deem an immigrant a "public charge" and deny the application if they determine he or she is more likely than not to use one of the considered benefits for 12 months or longer over the span of three years. On certain occasions, those deemed a "public charge" could post a bond for an amount no less than $8,100. 

To determine whether prospective immigrants are likely to become a "public charge," caseworkers would also take into account their wealth, age, educational skills, English language proficiency and health. Since those expected to be affected by the rule are not eligible for most public benefits because they aren't U.S. citizens or permanent residents, critics of the regulation say it is designed to severely restrict immigration based on those factors. 

Immigrant advocates are concerned about the effects the rule could have on people who are technically not subject it. Researchers have documented a "chilling effect" stemming from the proposed changes that have prompted some fearful immigrant families, including families that include U.S. citizens, to drop out of benefits programs.

The stringent requirements proposed by the "public charge" rule are not the only moves the administration has taken to impose limits on legal immigration.

In October, the White House issued a proclamation allowing the government to reject visa applications from would-be immigrants it determines won't be able to cover their medical costs. The plan, which is still being held up in court, could deny entry to approximately 375,000 prospective immigrants each year, according to an estimate by the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. 

A proposed rule by USCIS published in November would hike petition fees for immigrants seeking U.S. citizenship, for young undocumented immigrants known as "DREAMers" trying to renew protections from deportation and for victims of crimes who are seeking to stay in the country through their assistance to law enforcement. The proposal would also make the U.S. one of only four nations that require asylum-seekers fleeing persecution to pay a fee to file affirmative requests for protection.

 

US already has one in four dependent on food stamps.. as per actual numbers. Why would they allow more who might be potentially adding to this already ballooning number.  its good move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...