Lonelyloner Posted January 4, 2021 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 CHILIPI KRISHNULU CHALA MANDE UNNARU DB LO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karthik25 Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 51 minutes ago, Sachin200 said: Ashoka edicts, inscriptions were found in different countries including India , nepal , pakistan , afghanistan . If it is myth then how it can be in other nations ? All these countries you mentioned are close by. part of 'Akhand bharat'. Anyway, Gandhari (wife of Dhrtarashtra) was from Kandhar, which is in Afghanistan. Her name comes from that place. Lanka, mentioned in Ramayana is still a country with the same name. So, by your logic how are the epics myths? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karthik25 Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 44 minutes ago, ChinnaBhasha said: if someone says you have 10 years kid, it doesn't mean you gave birth directly to 10 years kid. same way, ashokudu mokkalu natinchadu, avi chetlu ainay. adi story. 😀 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin200 Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 2 minutes ago, karthik25 said: All these countries you mentioned are close by. part of 'Akhand bharat'. Anyway, Gandhari (wife of Dhrtarashtra) was from Kandhar, which is in Afghanistan. Her name comes from that place. Lanka, mentioned in Ramayana is still a country with the same name. So, by your logic how are the epics myths? I am saying they are real not myth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karthik25 Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 1 hour ago, PilliBeta said: Mari Ashokuda chettlu enduku naatinchaadu? Mokkalni enduku naatinchaledu? inta high level discussion avutundani anukoledu.. I can't debate anymore to such high level logic incomprehensible to my tiny brain. I am out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karthik25 Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 2 minutes ago, Sachin200 said: I am saying they are real not myth okay... ade anukonna.. manam manam eppati nundo okati kada.. manaki argument entabba ani 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin200 Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 1 minute ago, karthik25 said: okay... ade anukonna.. manam manam eppati nundo okati kada.. manaki argument entabba ani Just Ashoka real aa Ani question chestey , just response icha . We are team members Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karthik25 Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 1 hour ago, Democraticcompulsion said: That mom jeevida db. Inta hatred only Paki galla twitter feed lo ne choosa. But pedda ethuna Hinduism ki against ga propaganda jarugutundi. Andulo major part hindus di avvadam sochaneeyam. heyyyyyyy.. nijam cheppu... @JaiTDP ante nuvve kada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gothamprince Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 3 hours ago, karthik25 said: Please answer these questions: 1) Mahabharatha mentions places- Dwaraka, Mathura, Gokula, Indraprastha, Kandhar. Goverdhan etc. These are just a few. To this date we find these places. The culture at these places is quite preserved till now, despite the world changing so much. How can you say this is not history but a myth? 2) Putting your logic back to you- how can you justify any history. For example, what is the proof Babur existed? What is the proof that King Ashoka existed? Modern historians agree that Ramanujacarya existed. How can you prove this? 3) The author of the book Vedavyasa even predicts the future kings. Not 20-30 years. but 100s and 1000s of years. If he was writing just a created story, how come his future predictions are spot on? 4) The books written by Vyasa are there till now. He himself mentions in the book that he wrote them. He mentions his meetings with Krishna, Dharmaraja, Arjuna, Kunti etc. Then what is the problem in accepting? Did the author of harry Potter say she met the guy? There are so many arguments if one is ready to accept. But if one is already convinced that Mahabharatha is a myth.. then nothing can be done. gurram ni cheruvu daggaraki teeskelacchu.. but you can't make it drink water. If you want to justify anything can be justified. well said ba keep going ee madhya mana dharmani mana itihasala mida comment cheyadam fashion aipoindi kali prabhavam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gothamprince Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 mahabharata is itihasam means iti- hasa ante ala jarigindi ani . vysam narayana swayam ayane cheppinappudu ee discussion lu enti . what is there in mahabharatam is there everywhere in the world and what is not there doesn't exist in the world. alanti grandhanni . ramayanam lanti kavyanni ilanti goppa vatito vere denni polchalem . mahabharatam and ramayana will exist till the earth exist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonelyloner Posted January 4, 2021 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 4 hours ago, karthik25 said: Please answer these questions: 1) Mahabharatha mentions places- Dwaraka, Mathura, Gokula, Indraprastha, Kandhar. Goverdhan etc. These are just a few. To this date we find these places. The culture at these places is quite preserved till now, despite the world changing so much. How can you say this is not history but a myth? 2) Putting your logic back to you- how can you justify any history. For example, what is the proof Babur existed? What is the proof that King Ashoka existed? Modern historians agree that Ramanujacarya existed. How can you prove this? 3) The author of the book Vedavyasa even predicts the future kings. Not 20-30 years. but 100s and 1000s of years. If he was writing just a created story, how come his future predictions are spot on? 4) The books written by Vyasa are there till now. He himself mentions in the book that he wrote them. He mentions his meetings with Krishna, Dharmaraja, Arjuna, Kunti etc. Then what is the problem in accepting? Did the author of harry Potter say she met the guy? There are so many arguments if one is ready to accept. But if one is already convinced that Mahabharatha is a myth.. then nothing can be done. gurram ni cheruvu daggaraki teeskelacchu.. but you can't make it drink water. If you want to justify anything can be justified. All the above places were named after the story was made and well suited for gullible and naive hindus. I agree with history from kings period....why can't you guess the fact that kings were brainwashed with mythologies from schizophrenic people and autistic people. Predictions are mental illness, Vyasa had mental illness and autism may be. think about it, how can he meet a mythical figure. lol During those days there was no treatment. The word schizophrenia was coined by the Swiss psychiatrist and eugenicist Eugen Bleuler in 1908, and was intended to describe the separation of function between personality, thinking, memory, and perception. Gurram ki freedom isthe ade taguthundhi vethukoni nijam telusukuntundhi evari sahayam lekunda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Democraticcompulsion Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 2 hours ago, karthik25 said: heyyyyyyy.. nijam cheppu... @JaiTDP ante nuvve kada I really don't like TDP's kannamba kalam politics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustChill_Mama Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 loneyloner sharing his thoughts with dbians be like 😂😂😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonelyloner Posted January 4, 2021 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 42 minutes ago, JustChill_Mama said: loneyloner sharing his thoughts with dbians be like 😂😂😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karthik25 Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 2 hours ago, Lonelyloner said: All the above places were named after the story was made and well suited for gullible and naive hindus. I agree with history from kings period....why can't you guess the fact that kings were brainwashed with mythologies from schizophrenic people and autistic people. Predictions are mental illness, Vyasa had mental illness and autism may be. think about it, how can he meet a mythical figure. lol During those days there was no treatment. The word schizophrenia was coined by the Swiss psychiatrist and eugenicist Eugen Bleuler in 1908, and was intended to describe the separation of function between personality, thinking, memory, and perception. Gurram ki freedom isthe ade taguthundhi vethukoni nijam telusukuntundhi evari sahayam lekunda. edchinattundi.. Our astronomical calculations were so perfect. Even now, you name a random year, like 2089 or even 3089, and you based on our ancient astronomy you can predict when there will be solar and lunar eclipse. Can schizophrenic people give such perfect science? See constructions of that time. Jagannath temple is rock solid. Even according to modern people, that temple was made at least a few 1000s of years ago. Severe floods in Uttarakhand. Mottam villages kottuku poyayi but Kedarnath temple was steady. Autism people kattara? Do you even know what autism is? Those people have difficulty communicating. So all our scriptures which are present till date were written by people with autism? Ayurveda- it is such great resource. I know many people who got their PhDs done and their starting point was based on Ayurveda. They just replicated what was there in Ayurveda. Autism unnavallu ichara aa science? matladite ardham undali.. if you agree till history of kings, what before that? who were there on this land before them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.