Carona e kulam vallaki takuva vachindi

[Tyler_durden]

 

[futureofandhra]

32 minutes ago, Unityunity2 said:

Calling @futureofandhra 

old age home ki donate chesey heart vunna neeku ee caste hatred disease vundatam bad

try to change ledhu anukuntey time will teach you

[JackSeal]

2 minutes ago, Tyler_durden said:

 

Lol ... an aryan saying aryan invasion is a myth

[Unityunity2]

27 minutes ago, futureofandhra said:

old age home ki donate chesey heart vunna neeku ee caste hatred disease vundatam bad

try to change ledhu anukuntey time will teach you

Exactly am saying the same ,.. here most of DB persons know who will have this gajji .. 

[futureofandhra]

9 minutes ago, Unityunity2 said:

Exactly am saying the same ,.. here most of DB persons know who will have this gajji .. 

ok be in that hate world 

[MiryaIgudaMaruthiRao]

17 minutes ago, futureofandhra said:

ok be in that hate world 

@anna_dengu_anna_nuvu

[Telugodura456]

1 hour ago, NiranjanGaaru said:

Ambedkar rejected aryan Dravidian theory

Ambedkar viewed the Shudras as Aryan and adamantly rejected the Aryan invasion theory, describing it as "so absurd that it ought to have been dead long ago" in his 1946 book Who Were the Shudras?.^[145] Ambedkar viewed Shudras as originally being "part of the Kshatriya Varna in the Indo-Aryan society", but became socially degraded after they inflicted many tyrannies on Brahmins.^[146]

According to Arvind Sharma, Ambedkar noticed certain flaws in the Aryan invasion theory that were later acknowledged by western scholarship. For example, scholars now acknowledge anās in Rig Veda 5.29.10 refers to speech rather than the shape of the nose.^[147] Ambedkar anticipated this modern view by stating:

The term Anasa occurs in Rig Veda V.29.10. What does the word mean? There are two interpretations. One is by Prof. Max Muller. The other is by Sayanacharya. According to Prof. Max Muller, it means 'one without nose' or 'one with a flat nose' and has as such been relied upon as a piece of evidence in support of the view that the Aryans were a separate race from the Dasyus. Sayanacharya says that it means 'mouthless,' i.e., devoid of good speech. This difference of meaning is due to difference in the correct reading of the word Anasa. Sayanacharya reads it as an-asa while Prof. Max Muller reads it as a-nasa. As read by Prof. Max Muller, it means 'without nose.' Question is : which of the two readings is the correct one? There is no reason to hold that Sayana's reading is wrong. On the other hand there is everything to suggest that it is right. In the first place, it does not make non-sense of the word. Secondly, as there is no other place where the Dasyus are described as noseless, there is no reason why the word should be read in such a manner as to give it an altogether new sense. It is only fair to read it as a synonym of Mridhravak. There is therefore no evidence in support of the conclusion that the Dasyus belonged to a different race.^[147]

Ambedkar disputed various hypotheses of the Aryan homeland being outside India, and concluded the Aryan homeland was India itself. According to Ambedkar, the Rig Veda says Aryans, Dāsa and Dasyus were competing religious groups, not different peoples.^[148]

Babu this is highly  dubious what you are doing like that scumbag @Raven_Rayes . If you fundamentally do not agree with Ambedkar (he despised  hinduism not just hindutva) then you shouldnt quote him like this .

[Telugodura456]

Why are indian obsessed with aryan-dravidian nonsense. They like to blame dravidians for doing it but in reality this was highly popularized by brahmins like Tilak etc because they liked that are associated with white europeans who are most succesful then. THe only problem for this people is "Aryan invasion" because that interferes with their project of claiming leadership . Otherwise even now they enjoy the word "aryan" calling themselves noble and what not.

[NiranjanGaaru]

4 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

Babu this is highly  dubious what you are doing like that scumbag @Raven_Rayes . If you fundamentally do not agree with Ambedkar (he despised  hinduism not just hindutva) then you shouldnt quote him like this .

Ambedkar is never an anti national like periyar, I will always agree with him 

[NiranjanGaaru]

1 hour ago, JackSeal said:

Lol ... an aryan saying aryan invasion is a myth

Who should say pastor cadwell, max mueller, some random white guy then u will believe

[Telugodura456]

2 minutes ago, NiranjanGaaru said:

Ambedkar is never an anti national like periyar, I will always agree with him 

Are you sure ?

[Rushabhi]

5 hours ago, MiryaIgudaMaruthiRao said:

@psycopk ban him immediately I say 

Corona variants laaga kotha variant ids tho vasthadu. Adho virus. Vachude mods chethilo undi. Vadilinchukovatam kashtam

[NiranjanGaaru]

8 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

Are you sure ?

Yeah pretty sure, he said who is from non indian religion ie. Hinduism, Buddhism, jainism, sikh are not indians

, even no hindutva leader critised xtianity and Islam like that

[Telugodura456]

4 minutes ago, NiranjanGaaru said:

Yeah pretty sure, he said who is from non indian religion ie. Hinduism, Buddhism, jainism, sikh are not indians

, even no hindutva leader critised xtianity and Islam like that

Baabu nenadigedhi okataithe nuvu cheppedhi inkoti. do you agree with what ambedkar wrote about hindus and hinduism ?

[NiranjanGaaru]

3 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

Baabu nenadigedhi okataithe nuvu cheppedhi inkoti. do you agree with what ambedkar wrote about hindus and hinduism ?

Do u agree with ambedkar on all issues? First tell me... On kashmir, article 370,sanskrit , xtianity, Islam, Nehru, giving seperate country based on religion Pakistan , etc etc