At least 70% of Amaravati prone to floods: IIT-Madras

[JackSeal]

Construction is expensive due to presence of rocks at depths greater than 40 metres’

In its report on the conditions in Amaravati, where the TDP government proposed to develop the capital city, the IIT-Madras has stated that the constitution areas on the south of the Krishna such as the sports, government, finance and tourism cities are not recommended for construction due to significant risks of flooding.

As per the report, a copy of which is available with The Hindu, IIT-Madras also observed that construction was expensive due to the presence of rocks at depths greater than 40 metres, and the costs to raise or fill up the area to prevent flooding would be very high, and it would be dangerous to other areas. 

Besides, it was mentioned in the master plan prepared by the Capital Region Development Authority (CRDA) that it was recommended to raise / fill up three to four metres, which is higher than the historical flood level of the Krishna river, and redesigning it entailed significant costs.

The cost of construction in the capital area would be very high due to the pile foundation required to be laid. The raft foundation with basement was not advisable due to the groundwater level at 2.50 metres to 5 metres below the ground level. 

The IIT-Madras further observed that at least 70% of the proposed capital area could be affected by floods, and that constructions on and near the riverbed were fraught with high risks.

[bramhacharimogudu]

[Dhevudu2]

4 minutes ago, JackSeal said:

Construction is expensive due to presence of rocks at depths greater than 40 metres’

In its report on the conditions in Amaravati, where the TDP government proposed to develop the capital city, the IIT-Madras has stated that the constitution areas on the south of the Krishna such as the sports, government, finance and tourism cities are not recommended for construction due to significant risks of flooding.

As per the report, a copy of which is available with The Hindu, IIT-Madras also observed that construction was expensive due to the presence of rocks at depths greater than 40 metres, and the costs to raise or fill up the area to prevent flooding would be very high, and it would be dangerous to other areas. 

Besides, it was mentioned in the master plan prepared by the Capital Region Development Authority (CRDA) that it was recommended to raise / fill up three to four metres, which is higher than the historical flood level of the Krishna river, and redesigning it entailed significant costs.

The cost of construction in the capital area would be very high due to the pile foundation required to be laid. The raft foundation with basement was not advisable due to the groundwater level at 2.50 metres to 5 metres below the ground level. 

The IIT-Madras further observed that at least 70% of the proposed capital area could be affected by floods, and that constructions on and near the riverbed were fraught with high risks.

Is it true?

[psycopk]

Iit madras ante intelligent fellows kabati silent ga untaru ani nicely planned by jaffas.. last 50yrs lo

amaravathi ki enni sarlu varadalu vachai.. hyd ki eni sarlu vachai.. half brain jaffas

[Pavanonline]

22 minutes ago, JackSeal said:

Construction is expensive due to presence of rocks at depths greater than 40 metres’

In its report on the conditions in Amaravati, where the TDP government proposed to develop the capital city, the IIT-Madras has stated that the constitution areas on the south of the Krishna such as the sports, government, finance and tourism cities are not recommended for construction due to significant risks of flooding.

As per the report, a copy of which is available with The Hindu, IIT-Madras also observed that construction was expensive due to the presence of rocks at depths greater than 40 metres, and the costs to raise or fill up the area to prevent flooding would be very high, and it would be dangerous to other areas. 

Besides, it was mentioned in the master plan prepared by the Capital Region Development Authority (CRDA) that it was recommended to raise / fill up three to four metres, which is higher than the historical flood level of the Krishna river, and redesigning it entailed significant costs.

The cost of construction in the capital area would be very high due to the pile foundation required to be laid. The raft foundation with basement was not advisable due to the groundwater level at 2.50 metres to 5 metres below the ground level. 

The IIT-Madras further observed that at least 70% of the proposed capital area could be affected by floods, and that constructions on and near the riverbed were fraught with high risks.

inkem cheparu vizag lo cyclones ravu ana?

[JackSeal]

Use common sense Hyderabad floods are due to encroachment of drains, lakes, illegal constructions and not because Hyderabad in flood prone area … whereas amaravati in flood prone area  … no company will invest in amaravati one flood in a century is enough to reset it 

 

 

[kdapparao]

18 minutes ago, psycopk said:

Iit madras ante intelligent fellows kabati silent ga untaru ani nicely planned by jaffas.. last 50yrs lo

amaravathi ki enni sarlu varadalu vachai.. hyd ki eni sarlu vachai.. half brain jaffas

Baramavathi adi yekkada undi bro inthaka mundu flood statistics teyadaniki? Commonsense ani okate yedvali kada yenta brainwashed aina? Inthaki krishna river okati aa area untadi ani idea unda adi kuda leada.. flood prone region kada raft foundation yenduku vesaro mari akkada nee pulka brain ni adigi soodu

[MiryalgudaMaruthiRao]

4 minutes ago, JackSeal said:

Use common sense Hyderabad floods are due to encroachment of drains, lakes, illegal constructions and not because Hyderabad in flood prone area … whereas amaravati in flood prone area  … no company will invest in amaravati one flood in a century is enough to reset it 

 

 

me langa galla edupulu mundu avi anni digadudupe

[kfrockz]

idi oka tuppas report ani eppudo telchesaru ga. idi kotta report aa?

[mettastar]

2 minutes ago, kfrockz said:

idi oka tuppas report ani eppudo telchesaru ga. idi kotta report aa?

About to reply the same .. appatlo IIT madras vaallu e report ki maku sambandham ledu ani statement ichinattunnaru ga ..

 

Paytm gaallu malli abadhanni nijam chedham ani pracharam started aa 

[Anta Assamey]

38 minutes ago, JackSeal said:

Construction is expensive due to presence of rocks at depths greater than 40 metres’

In its report on the conditions in Amaravati, where the TDP government proposed to develop the capital city, the IIT-Madras has stated that the constitution areas on the south of the Krishna such as the sports, government, finance and tourism cities are not recommended for construction due to significant risks of flooding.

As per the report, a copy of which is available with The Hindu, IIT-Madras also observed that construction was expensive due to the presence of rocks at depths greater than 40 metres, and the costs to raise or fill up the area to prevent flooding would be very high, and it would be dangerous to other areas. 

Besides, it was mentioned in the master plan prepared by the Capital Region Development Authority (CRDA) that it was recommended to raise / fill up three to four metres, which is higher than the historical flood level of the Krishna river, and redesigning it entailed significant costs.

The cost of construction in the capital area would be very high due to the pile foundation required to be laid. The raft foundation with basement was not advisable due to the groundwater level at 2.50 metres to 5 metres below the ground level. 

The IIT-Madras further observed that at least 70% of the proposed capital area could be affected by floods, and that constructions on and near the riverbed were fraught with high risks.

This report was not by us ani appatlo IIT vallu cheppinattu gurthu...

[JackSeal]

2 minutes ago, Anta Assamey said:

This report was not by us ani appatlo IIT vallu cheppinattu gurthu...

Hindu published this and later they published an explanation on the source of the news and its infact correct ani 

[Pavanonline]

21 minutes ago, kdapparao said:

Baramavathi adi yekkada undi bro inthaka mundu flood statistics teyadaniki? Commonsense ani okate yedvali kada yenta brainwashed aina? Inthaki krishna river okati aa area untadi ani idea unda adi kuda leada.. flood prone region kada raft foundation yenduku vesaro mari akkada nee pulka brain ni adigi soodu

lots of cities are built beside river ra genius, not just in India, in every country. flood management ani okati okati untadi, lekapothe river unna lekapoyina floods vastai like hyd. better stick to your brainless pacha media comments

[Anta Assamey]

8 minutes ago, JackSeal said:

Hindu published this and later they published an explanation on the source of the news and its infact correct ani 

Check this link.... Official Website of IIT-M... It list all the RTI from IIT-M.... search for the number... 92-2021 and you will see their reply...Not once but they said it multiple times...

https://www.iitm.ac.in/sites/default/files/Others/rti-replies-in-2020.pdf

So the article is FAKE....

[nokia123]

49 minutes ago, JackSeal said:

Construction is expensive due to presence of rocks at depths greater than 40 metres’

In its report on the conditions in Amaravati, where the TDP government proposed to develop the capital city, the IIT-Madras has stated that the constitution areas on the south of the Krishna such as the sports, government, finance and tourism cities are not recommended for construction due to significant risks of flooding.

As per the report, a copy of which is available with The Hindu, IIT-Madras also observed that construction was expensive due to the presence of rocks at depths greater than 40 metres, and the costs to raise or fill up the area to prevent flooding would be very high, and it would be dangerous to other areas. 

Besides, it was mentioned in the master plan prepared by the Capital Region Development Authority (CRDA) that it was recommended to raise / fill up three to four metres, which is higher than the historical flood level of the Krishna river, and redesigning it entailed significant costs.

The cost of construction in the capital area would be very high due to the pile foundation required to be laid. The raft foundation with basement was not advisable due to the groundwater level at 2.50 metres to 5 metres below the ground level. 

The IIT-Madras further observed that at least 70% of the proposed capital area could be affected by floods, and that constructions on and near the riverbed were fraught with high risks.

Varashalu vasthe Chennai kooda 75% munigipoddhi..adhi choosukomanu first