HMDA to do land pooling of 11,000 acres of farmers land in hyderabad, invest 55,000 crores

[Telugodura456]

@Ryzen_renoir

 

[Telugodura456]

exact copy of amaravathy.

[JackSeal]

Just now, Telugodura456 said:

exact copy of amaravathy.

But this will be prajala rajadhani whereas amaravathi is yellow mafia rajadhani ani @kdapparaoantunde

[Telugodura456]

Just now, JackSeal said:

But this will be prajala rajadhani whereas amaravathi is yellow mafia rajadhani ani @kdapparaoantunde

manam chesthe srungaram..vallu chesthe ...

[Swatkat]

10 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

manam chesthe srungaram..vallu chesthe ...

 

13 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

exact copy of amaravathy.

Musalodu pic oettinapude ardham cheskovali ah @JackSeal athi

[Ryzen_renoir]

23 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

exact copy of amaravathy.

Main difference is the land value to investment ratio of government is fair here . 

An acre around hydrerabad easily costs 5 crores . 55000 crores is fair 

An acre of land around amaravathi was only  25  lakhs on average . So the expenditure should be only about 10000 crores at max 

If it is same copy of amaravathi then Kcr should spend atleast  550000 crores 

[Telugodura456]

24 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Main difference is the land value to investment ratio of government is fair here . 

An acre around hydrerabad easily costs 5 crores . 55000 crores is fair 

An acre of land around amaravathi was only  25  lakhs on average . So the expenditure should be only about 10000 crores at max 

If it is same copy of amaravathi then Kcr should spend atleast  550000 crores 

Nuvvu nee lekkalu - chaala parameters untai lera.

[Spartan]

next election ki dabbul mingadam ante 

 

[Ryzen_renoir]

9 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

Nuvvu nee lekkalu - chaala parameters untai lera.

What point do you disagreeing with ? 

Hyderabad generates atleast 150000 crores tax to state / center .so them spending 55000 crores in 11000 acres is not stealing from other parts of the state 

Even if you include whole of krishna , Guntur districts they  generate a small fraction of Hyderabad's tax. 

Your proposal is pooling is all the resources of the state to benefit few people 

Hmda proposal is to pool a small portion of Hyderabad's yearly tax to benefit land owners 

[Telugodura456]

4 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

What point do you disagreeing with ? 

Hyderabad generates atleast 150000 crores tax to state / center .so them spending 55000 crores in 11000 acres is not stealing from other parts of the state 

Even if you include whole of krishna , Guntur districts they  generate a small fraction of Hyderabad's tax. 

Your proposal is pooling is all the resources of the state to benefit few people 

Hmda proposal is to pool a small portion of Hyderabad's yearly tax to benefit land owners 

You have a fundamentally flawed understanding of human society and economic growth. you keep arguing that growth has to be "natural" or organic. but human civilization is fundamentally anti-nature and is a struggle against nature bending it to the benefit of humanity. Ofcourse you say this not because of you really believe in them or understand them but due to your underlying caste anxieties and calculations.

it is possible to generate even higher level of land prices in amaravati through human planning and short cuts.

If everything is "natural" then you wont have advancing countries and falling back countries.

[Ryzen_renoir]

9 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

You have a fundamentally flawed understanding of human society and economic growth. you keep arguing that growth has to be "natural" or organic. but human civilization is fundamentally anti-nature and is a struggle against nature bending it to the benefit of humanity. Ofcourse you say this not because of you really believe in them or understand them but due to your underlying caste anxieties and calculations.

it is possible to generate even higher level of land prices in amaravati through human planning and short cuts.

If everything is "natural" then you wont have advancing countries and falling back countries.

There are extremely few countries that have grown without being in the right location or natural resources 

Countries with prosperous neighbours , strategic locations and high natural resources per capita(or stealing them)  have always prospered with right policies

Show me a single country which have developed when they are surrounded by poor countries, low natural resources or not in strategic trade routes 

Creating something in vaccum  require extreme resource diversion like the Europeans who stole and stole from the colonies 

[Telugodura456]

12 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

There are extremely few countries that have grown without being in the right location or natural resources 

Countries with prosperous neighbours , strategic locations and high natural resources per capita(or stealing them)  have always prospered with right policies

Show me a single country which have developed when they are surrounded by poor countries, low natural resources or not in strategic trade routes 

Creating something in vaccum  require extreme resource diversion like the Europeans who stole and stole from the colonies 

it is right location and resources are also plenty. an entire socio economic analysis was done on it.

Countries have developed in all locations , china has low natural resources, surronded by north korea and soviet and india. surronded by huge number of american military bases.

South korea had north korea as border and no natural resources.

Even the flood prone bangaldesh which was historically poor now has higer gdp per capita than india.

 

[MiryalgudaMaruthiRao]

[Spartan]