Swami saranam!!!

[uttermost]

4 minutes ago, coca-cola said:

No doubt mosque or church no descrimination should be encouraged...

but muslims, Xians, and Hindus will have losers like this db to defend that discrimination.

[uttermost]

1 minute ago, coca-cola said:

Bossu Telugu la solludaa

organized religion (which Hinduism is, inspite of what hindus claim) is not about God, but about feeding the ego of those who hold the keys to God. There's no rational discussion to be had with them.

just flow in the army, and crack open the skulls of those fighting the SC order. simple. these people don't deserve any respect or decency.

[uttermost]

Funny how the hindutva face of Congress is out too, with this drama.

using religion for politics.

[kingcasanova]

1 hour ago, uttermost said:

 religion is a tool to control the masses. so your question is mostly pointless.

defending Ayyappa trust board's stance on this is only possible if you are a disgusting asshole. which is what majority ppl in this thread defending them are. They know it too.

bokka le

[chittimallu2]

1 hour ago, uttermost said:

organized religion (which Hinduism is, inspite of what hindus claim) is not about God, but about feeding the ego of those who hold the keys to God. There's no rational discussion to be had with them.

just flow in the army, and crack open the skulls of those fighting the SC order. simple. these people don't deserve any respect or decency.

So much irony about ego in that post...

Any real female believer of Swamy Ayyappa wont dare to visit the temple just because SC gave a nod, they believe in the rules of the temple and God. 

It's only a few egoistic morons who are not really believers but want to "prove" something would want to visit and rub it in the believers' faces. Why does a non believer even want to visit the temple? Do they ever visit any of the 10000s of temples in India where women are allowed?  Its clearly evident they are only doing this out of ego and trying to visit Sabarimala Temple. What they trying to prove here.

Your points are terribly foolish. Just because you have an agenda ahainst something dont make yourself a fool out of everything man. 

Good Night

[coca-cola]

24 minutes ago, chittimallu2 said:

So much irony about ego in that post...

Any real female believer of Swamy Ayyappa wont dare to visit the temple just because SC gave a nod, they believe in the rules of the temple and God. 

It's only a few egoistic morons who are not really believers but want to "prove" something would want to visit and rub it in the believers' faces. Why does a non believer even want to visit the temple? Do they ever visit any of the 10000s of temples in India where women are allowed?  Its clearly evident they are only doing this out of ego and trying to visit Sabarimala Temple. What they trying to prove here.

Your points are terribly foolish. Just because you have an agenda ahainst something dont make yourself a fool out of everything man. 

Good Night

Ego....

[uttermost]

1 hour ago, chittimallu2 said:

 So much irony about ego in that post...

Any real female believer of Swamy Ayyappa wont dare to visit the temple just because SC gave a nod, they believe in the rules of the temple and God. 

It's only a few egoistic morons who are not really believers but want to "prove" something would want to visit and rub it in the believers' faces. Why does a non believer even want to visit the temple? Do they ever visit any of the 10000s of temples in India where women are allowed?  Its clearly evident they are only doing this out of ego and trying to visit Sabarimala Temple. What they trying to prove here.

 Your points are terribly foolish. Just because you have an agenda ahainst something dont make yourself a fool out of everything man. 

Good Night

I keep hearing this 'real believer of Swamy Ayyappa' bullshit. is a lot similar to what some radical muslims claimed about Haji Ali when the issue of allowing women into Haji came up couple yrs back.

Finally women were allowed into the Haji Ali, and muslims apart from making a few noises, didn't engage in the kind of rowdyism that certain Ayyappa bhakts have indulged in.

So are we now accepting that Hindus are far more violent than muslims in India, finally? because it is true. and this is proof.

rest of what you wrote is immaterial. people can go to a temple for whatever they wish to. Its like kids going to a public library. some go to study, some go because they like a chick/stud in the library, some go because they want to cool off in the AC.

All this problem is because the govt has allowed some boards (in this case Travancore Devasvom board) to keep some power. And this what happens when temples are quasi private. A section of population is restricted. that's why govt should take over all temples, and maintain it like TN govt does. 

[uttermost]

1 hour ago, chittimallu2 said:

 So much irony about ego in that post...

Any real female believer of Swamy Ayyappa wont dare to visit the temple just because SC gave a nod, they believe in the rules of the temple and God. 

It's only a few egoistic morons who are not really believers but want to "prove" something would want to visit and rub it in the believers' faces. Why does a non believer even want to visit the temple? Do they ever visit any of the 10000s of temples in India where women are allowed?  Its clearly evident they are only doing this out of ego and trying to visit Sabarimala Temple. What they trying to prove here.

 Your points are terribly foolish. Just because you have an agenda ahainst something dont make yourself a fool out of everything man. 

Good Night

Hinduism is organized at the local level, unlike Islam and Xianity.

small pockets of power, that dictate their local preferences.

Its possible to smugly claim that women can access other gods/temples if they chose, but thats not the point. The point is about breaking this particular temple from the shackles of bureaucracy, because it restricts women. What kind of 'tradition' is that?

If Haji Ali allowed women inside, why can't Sabarimala?

[uttermost]

1 hour ago, chittimallu2 said:

 So much irony about ego in that post...

Any real female believer of Swamy Ayyappa wont dare to visit the temple just because SC gave a nod, they believe in the rules of the temple and God. 

It's only a few egoistic morons who are not really believers but want to "prove" something would want to visit and rub it in the believers' faces. Why does a non believer even want to visit the temple? Do they ever visit any of the 10000s of temples in India where women are allowed?  Its clearly evident they are only doing this out of ego and trying to visit Sabarimala Temple. What they trying to prove here.

 Your points are terribly foolish. Just because you have an agenda ahainst something dont make yourself a fool out of everything man. 

Good Night

how about a referendum among hindu women and men in kerala on whether women should be allowed inside the temple? lol.

the devaswom board is so losing that referendm, if it happens. normal people don't give a fcuk.

its just political goons who are making the noise now, making some people who are neutral to take a stand in their support as if their stance is the popular one.

[uttermost]

1 hour ago, kingcasanova said:

bokka le

read your earlier comment. big big lol. you are seriously deluded and so dumb.

[kingcasanova]

1 hour ago, uttermost said:

read your earlier comment. big big lol. you are seriously deluded and so dumb.

sollu cheppaku, matter cheppu 

[kingcasanova]

2 hours ago, uttermost said:

I keep hearing this 'real believer of Swamy Ayyappa' bullshit. is a lot similar to what some radical muslims claimed about Haji Ali when the issue of allowing women into Haji came up couple yrs back.

Finally women were allowed into the Haji Ali, and muslims apart from making a few noises, didn't engage in the kind of rowdyism that certain Ayyappa bhakts have indulged in.

So are we now accepting that Hindus are far more violent than muslims in India, finally? because it is true. and this is proof.

rest of what you wrote is immaterial. people can go to a temple for whatever they wish to. Its like kids going to a public library. some go to study, some go because they like a chick/stud in the library, some go because they want to cool off in the AC.

All this problem is because the govt has allowed some boards (in this case Travancore Devasvom board) to keep some power. And this what happens when temples are quasi private. A section of population is restricted. that's why govt should take over all temples, and maintain it like TN govt does. 

neekelaagu devudante nammakam ledu kada uttermostu, enduku ee sollantha.

akkada oka minority editor ayina MJ Akbar meeda ladies leni poni kathalu chepthunnaaru, velli vaadni kaapaadu

[coca-cola]

4 hours ago, kingcasanova said:

neekelaagu devudante nammakam ledu kada uttermostu, enduku ee sollantha.

akkada oka minority editor ayina MJ Akbar meeda ladies leni poni kathalu chepthunnaaru, velli vaadni kaapaadu

Lite.....em upayogam retirement life njoy cheyaka 

[uttermost]

4 hours ago, kingcasanova said:

sollu cheppaku, matter cheppu 

sollu gaallaki sollu chaalu.

[uttermost]

4 hours ago, kingcasanova said:

neekelaagu devudante nammakam ledu kada uttermostu, enduku ee sollantha.

akkada oka minority editor ayina MJ Akbar meeda ladies leni poni kathalu chepthunnaaru, velli vaadni kaapaadu

naaku devudantey nammakam leka ney,  i didn't bother reading the judgement.. I don't care about this issue. edho manodu thread vesaadey ani reply ichha anthey.

did you read the judgement? 

i'm pretty sure, apart from moral and religious reasons, there are legal ones too for the judgement. Like how much power devaswom board can legitimately weild in a quasi arrangement with the govt, etc. This is essentially like a property debate. I'm only guessing here, ofcourse.

I really don't care about this issue. It looks like you do. you should read the judgement and slap me hard with facts from the judgement. pls do. I'm glad to be corrected on why this is a bullshit judgement with an anti Hindu agenda.