so basically Hindus kay Hindu history telidu (including me)...

sarigga telusukunte baavuntundi.

 

10 minutes ago, TrollBait said:

krishna is imaginary. buddha is not.

 

lol 😂 all hindu gods are imaginary ... 

happies 

1 minute ago, dasari4kntr said:

ok...

two things i understand from your comment..

First...you didnt understand my comment..

Second...you dont want to understand my comment...

continue...in your flow...

good night ... my drink also finished...

 

baaga deep ga study chesi oka blog raayaali, about Indian history starting from when Indians developed readable language. because indus valley scripts are not readable at all.

okkodu vaadiki ishtamochina katha chepthunnadu. if bhagavad geetha was written 5500yrs ago, why is indus valley scripts unreadable by anyone now?

Just now, VenkyBabu said:

lol 😂 all hindu gods are imaginary ... 

happies 

is that something bad? so what if they are imaginary..

i enjoy them as stories, and critique them for certain aspects.

andulo feel avvtaaniki emundhi..

 

5 minutes ago, TrollBait said:

ee veda vyasa evaro.. evariki oka date ledhu..

patanjali antey oka date undhi.. sare edho sutra lu raasaru. we can read and debate ishtamunte.

vyasa evaru asalu. krishna laaga imaginary character... lekunte pen name for a diff author aa?

So Mahabharatam just a script antav kadha anthena ? 
ok you won ra

2 minutes ago, TrollBait said:

baaga deep ga study chesi oka blog raayaali, about Indian history starting from when Indians developed readable language. because indus valley scripts are not readable at all.

okkodu vaadiki ishtamochina katha chepthunnadu. if bhagavad geetha was written 5500yrs ago, why is indus valley scripts unreadable by anyone now?

you know what...

all this becuase of people are mixing the actual time line (our existence) with imaginary religious scripture time line...

 

in bible or quaron...people mixed the biblical time line (adam and eve, nova..etc) with actual time line..

in hindu religion - again people are mixing the actual time line with yuga (treta yuga, dwapara yuga) time line...

 

thats the reason we are getting confused...we are in actual time line...trying to fit those imagainary timelines in our actual timelines....

 

18 minutes ago, TrollBait said:

krishna is imaginary. buddha is not.

 

Kurukshetra happened far older than Indus valley civilization .. non hindu archeologist proved existence of lord krishna ... dwaraka submerged in sea .. it’s also proven fact . 
irony is nuvvu cheppe lord buddha ni one of the Vishnu avatar ga bhagavatam chepthundhi .. 

7 minutes ago, TrollBait said:

baaga deep ga study chesi oka blog raayaali, about Indian history starting from when Indians developed readable language. because indus valley scripts are not readable at all.

okkodu vaadiki ishtamochina katha chepthunnadu. if bhagavad geetha was written 5500yrs ago, why is indus valley scripts unreadable by anyone now?

I will contribute my writings on pissful religion ,wat do u say??

Idhantha kadhu kani nenu sanathana dharmam lo puttina... andhuke I’m believing hindu gods .non hindu ayyi unte nene hindu gods ni thittevadnemo? 
 

6 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

you know what...

all this becuase of people are mixing the actual time line (our existence) with imaginary religious scripture time line...

 

in bible or quaron...people mixed the biblical time line (adam and eve, nova..etc) with actual time line..

in hindu religion - again people are mixing the actual time line with yuga (treta yuga, dwapara yuga) time line...

 

thats the reason we are getting confused...we are in actual time line...trying to fit those imagainary timelines in our actual timelines....

 

Dwaparam lo mahabharatham happened just before 3500 years. Tharvatha hasthinapuram ni parikshit nunchi moghals dhaka evarevaro palincharo kuda undhi mari ... after existence of Buddha nammutham... after existence of jesus nammutham ante archeologist lu piccholla? Kurukshetra avvaledhu ani ... dwaraka lo krishnudu ledu ani prove cheyyochu kadha mana DB medhavulu 😂

Conclusion please

16 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

you know what...

all this becuase of people are mixing the actual time line (our existence) with imaginary religious scripture time line...

 

in bible or quaron...people mixed the biblical time line (adam and eve, nova..etc) with actual time line..

in hindu religion - again people are mixing the actual time line with yuga (treta yuga, dwapara yuga) time line...

 

thats the reason we are getting confused...we are in actual time line...trying to fit those imagainary timelines in our actual timelines....

 

western history is not based on imaginary timelines mentioned in bible.

Indian history before 500bc  is purely  concocted..

7 minutes ago, kevinUsa said:

Conclusion please

none of us know what we are talking about.

22 minutes ago, VenkyBabu said:

Kurukshetra happened far older than Indus valley civilization .. non hindu archeologist proved existence of lord krishna ... dwaraka submerged in sea .. it’s also proven fact . 
irony is nuvvu cheppe lord buddha ni one of the Vishnu avatar ga bhagavatam chepthundhi .. 

edanna okka daani meedha fix avvu... indus valley civilization existed 3500yrs ago.. malli ikkada edho chepthunnav 

 

15 minutes ago, VenkyBabu said:

Dwaparam lo mahabharatham happened just before 3500 years. Tharvatha hasthinapuram ni parikshit nunchi moghals dhaka evarevaro palincharo kuda undhi mari ... after existence of Buddha nammutham... after existence of jesus nammutham ante archeologist lu piccholla? Kurukshetra avvaledhu ani ... dwaraka lo krishnudu ledu ani prove cheyyochu kadha mana DB medhavulu 😂

 

paidi is just trolling every1 ani artham avthondi. lite