Canadian Muslim Scholar Explains Why Pedophilia is Ok in Islam

[DummyVariable]

12 minutes ago, Somedude said:

Not selective criticism. And not blind enough to see the context. He tagged both of them in thread where only Islam/Muslims are condemned indicating for their opinion. You really need to check his previous taggings.  That's what I call selective tagging. He never called them cut mirchi. I do't attribute that to him. That was for the people who can't argue based on logic. I have been called cut mirchi even though I criticse both the religions. Agreed, it would be good if they criticise both the religions equally. But it could be based on their personal experience in their lives. Like @crashnburn sharing his experience about brahmin boys harrasment in his school.

Are you @lovemystate outside?

[lovemystate]

The point here is they think they can shut down any criticism they don’t like by associating it with cut this cut that. Pathetic school boy bullying attempts.

[Somedude]

6 minutes ago, DummyVariable said:

Are you @lovemystate outside?

Yeah. Inside and outside. You found out

[Stanley]

2 hours ago, Somedude said:

WTF!! Ilantollani em cheyyali? What a stupid disgusting peice of $hit.

At 7:40 does she say that if the victim(child victim) doesn't say anything...thats considered consent. I just have no words.

[boeing747]

endi ee feaceful gola

[jeessy_bb]

2 hours ago, Somedude said:

Not selective criticism. And not blind enough to see the context. He tagged both of them in thread where only Islam/Muslims are condemned indicating for their opinion. You really need to check his previous taggings.  That's what I call selective tagging. He never called them cut mirchi. I do't attribute that to him. That was for the people who can't argue based on logic. I have been called cut mirchi even though I criticse both the religions. Agreed, it would be good if they criticise both the religions equally. But it could be based on their personal experience in their lives. Like @crashnburn sharing his experience about brahmin boys harrasment in his school.

How is it not selective criticism? How do you know others haven't had a bad experience in their lives due to the ppl they r criticizing? Just coz they haven't shared it ,how can you assume things and categorize ? There is a reason @crashnburn was tagged. He was the same guy who said culprits from one religion were falsely framed and everyone from that religion is innocent in the Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal. He is the same guy who defended pakistani terrorists ideology using the garb of religion saying its perfectly fine to carry out genocides in the name of religion. He is the guy who said all the atrocities originated in Hindu religion. When he wants to paint fallacies in one religion as perfectly normal and showcase other religion in bad light why cant others point out fallacies in the religion he adores ? @chittimallu_14 made a perfectly valid point and you are trying to veer it into something else. 

[sattipandu]

2 minutes ago, jeessy_bb said:

How is it not selective criticism? How do you know others haven't had a bad experience in their lives due to the ppl they r criticizing? Just coz they haven't shared it ,how can you assume things and categorize ? There is a reason @crashnburn was tagged. He was the same guy who said culprits from one religion were falsely framed and everyone from that religion is innocent in the Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal. He is the same guy who defended pakistani terrorists ideology using the garb of religion saying its perfectly fine to carry out genocides in the name of religion. He is the guy who said all the atrocities originated in Hindu religion. When he wants to paint fallacies in one religion as perfectly normal and showcase other religion in bad light why cant others point out fallacies in the religion he adores ? @chittimallu_14 made a perfectly valid point and you are trying to veer it into something else. 

Damn 

 

[jeessy_bb]

2 hours ago, Somedude said:

Not selective criticism. And not blind enough to see the context. He tagged both of them in thread where only Islam/Muslims are condemned indicating for their opinion. You really need to check his previous taggings.  That's what I call selective tagging. He never called them cut mirchi. I do't attribute that to him. That was for the people who can't argue based on logic. I have been called cut mirchi even though I criticse both the religions. Agreed, it would be good if they criticise both the religions equally. But it could be based on their personal experience in their lives. Like @crashnburn sharing his experience about brahmin boys harrasment in his school.

All this tagging ppl started because of a pig @Mitron . He always tries to flame the religious passions of ppl here . If you ask me i think @crashnburn @Mitron and @lovemystate are ids of same person. Of course @lovemystate was created  by Narsi after i took his case last time he criticized CBN. He was in his @pottipotato id. After getting the taste of my treatment he created @lovemystate id and started supporting CBN . 

[prasadr]

When the MahaMad is a pedophile,

the Abduls who think he is the perfect man, won't be far behind.

[jeessy_bb]

2 hours ago, lovemystate said:

The point here is they think they can shut down any criticism they don’t like by associating it with cut this cut that. Pathetic school boy bullying attempts.

This is called Irony and hypocricy. If you think you have moral high ground than the ppl you criticize,  then defend why is it normal to be paedophile in the religion you adore . Say you dont have the balls to criticize and expose ur pseudo secular stance. Stop  riding ur high horse here thinking you are intellectually superior to ppl from other religion

[jeessy_bb]

5 hours ago, Somedude said:

Why tagging them? i don't think they supported this stupid religion. They condemned Hindu religion and many of its fallacies. That doesn't make them people of this religion or they are supporters this religion. Any Hindu/India/BJP criticizer is called Muslim/cut mirchi and etc.

Alaage aa @crashnburn @lovemystate gaalu yevarina state govt policies support chesthe bhakth ani tag chesthharu mari appu levani nee noru ippudu lesthundhe? When they can be selective, stereotyping and flaming emotions in ppl with their incendiary posts , why cant others give them the taste of their own medicine? 

[kingcasanova]

On 10/19/2019 at 12:47 AM, Somedude said:

WTF!! Ilantollani em cheyyali? What a stupid disgusting peice of $hit.

At 7:40 does she say that if the victim(child victim) doesn't say anything...thats considered consent. I just have no words.

so they are free to rafe all dumb people, who can't speak

@lovemystate

[panipoori]

On 10/18/2019 at 2:24 PM, Somedude said:

Why tagging them? i don't think they supported this stupid religion. They condemned Hindu religion and many of its fallacies. That doesn't make them people of this religion or they are supporters this religion. Any Hindu/India/BJP criticizer is called Muslim/cut mirchi and etc.

Oh @Somedude you must be naive ....lovemystate gaadi paata posts tavvamantava where he outrighly said islam is better than hindus ani..

[crashnburn]

On 10/19/2019 at 2:42 AM, Somedude said:

Not selective criticism. And not blind enough to see the context. He tagged both of them in thread where only Islam/Muslims are condemned indicating for their opinion. You really need to check his previous taggings.  That's what I call selective tagging. He never called them cut mirchi. I do't attribute that to him. That was for the people who can't argue based on logic. I have been called cut mirchi even though I criticse both the religions. Agreed, it would be good if they criticise both the religions equally. But it could be based on their personal experience in their lives. Like @crashnburn sharing his experience about brahmin boys harrasment in his school.

haha.. my world view was not shaped by harassment at school. I was targeted because I was part of a badass gang, who's head got killed by one of his workers at 15yrs age (he was brahmin too). I was targeted because I was the smallest of the ones left after the gang got dissolved.

my worldview was shaped mostly by reaction to Rohit Vemula's murder.

i don't even criticize hindu religion. I criticize people who use religion for politics. people like this speaker above are probably significant drivers of politics, but I don't know. 

would I criticize Islam based on this? yeah sure. I don't care about Islam, but do care about muslims.

r

[crashnburn]

On 10/19/2019 at 5:08 AM, jeessy_bb said:

How is it not selective criticism? How do you know others haven't had a bad experience in their lives due to the ppl they r criticizing? Just coz they haven't shared it ,how can you assume things and categorize ? There is a reason @crashnburn was tagged. He was the same guy who said culprits from one religion were falsely framed and everyone from that religion is innocent in the Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal. He is the same guy who defended pakistani terrorists ideology using the garb of religion saying its perfectly fine to carry out genocides in the name of religion. He is the guy who said all the atrocities originated in Hindu religion. When he wants to paint fallacies in one religion as perfectly normal and showcase other religion in bad light why cant others point out fallacies in the religion he adores ? @chittimallu_14 made a perfectly valid point and you are trying to veer it into something else. 

don't try too hard. 

what about rotherham scandal? stop bullshitting just because you are pissed off at me. makes you look like a fool.